I've always thought that Autonomy had a strong whiff of fraud about it. I never hear anyone talk about working there, their financial reporting is often shadier than Groupon's, there's a Madoff-esque figure at the top (in the sense that he seems to be treated as almost godlike), and no-one seems to use its products.
I know it powers the FT's search facility and they joke about how useless it is.
My only explanation has been that it perhaps has a heavy focus on intelligence work.
I hope HP are prepared for some lengthy due diligence.
Back when the deal was announced I was exteremely skeptical. $10.2 billions for a relatively unknown UK software company that focuses on document management? 10 billions?! Their (Autonomy's) past acquisitions looked rather erratic to me. I also did not understand as to why a hardware company like HP would buy a software company in the first place. Then there were all the glassdoor posts discussed here on HN... the whole deal just looked shady even back then.
edit: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2902749 I just stumbled upon this comment by AlexMuir, it was the most upvoted comment on the HN discussion about HP's acquisition of Autonomy
I've always thought that Autonomy had a strong whiff of fraud about it. I never hear anyone talk about working there, their financial reporting is often shadier than Groupon's, there's a Madoff-esque figure at the top (in the sense that he seems to be treated as almost godlike), and no-one seems to use its products.
I know it powers the FT's search facility and they joke about how useless it is.
My only explanation has been that it perhaps has a heavy focus on intelligence work.
I hope HP are prepared for some lengthy due diligence.