 |
| Reading privileged memory with a side-channel (googleprojectzero.blogspot.com) | ||
| recommended by 2 users | 2018 | 2334 points by brandon | vulns & breaches | original thread | | ||
| Also recommended by people who recommended this: | ||
| 1. | “Did you win the Putnam?” (comment) | |
| recommended by 50 users | 2007 | sanj on: The Equity Equation | original thread | | ||
| 2. | “We ended up using eSupport (which is a complete piece of shit)” (comment) | |
| recommended by 1 user | 2010 | megamark16 on: Zendesk raises their prices 60%-300%, users predictably… | aged well | original thread | | ||
| 3. | The LMAX Architecture - 100K TPS at Less than 1ms Latency (martinfowler.com) | |
| recommended by 2 users | 2011 | 210 points by koevet | original thread | | ||
| 4. | Ask HN: On Rob Pike's Concurrency is not Parallelism? | |
| recommended by 1 user | 2012 | 51 points by lazydon | original thread | | ||
| 5. | How to crawl a quarter billion webpages in 40 hours (michaelnielsen.org) | |
| recommended by 2 users | 2012 | 323 points by cing | original thread | | ||
| 6. | Parallelism and concurrency need different tools (yosefk.com) | |
| recommended by 2 users | 2013 | 166 points by mhd | original thread | | ||
Project Zero has published a detailed writeup on this. It's worth noting (in the context of Intel's response) that the P0 post confirms that AMD and ARM CPUs are also affected:
"Variants of this issue are known to affect many modern processors, including certain processors by Intel, AMD and ARM. For a few Intel and AMD CPU models, we have exploits that work against real software. We reported this issue to Intel, AMD and ARM on 2017-06-01"
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privi...
Edit: Discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16065845