The comment does not present any supporting evidence (even one query where ddg falls over would help, a deep technical analysis of why google is better, with large scale comparisons of result quality would be persuasive).
It is the equivalent to me replying to you with:
"You don't know why the comment sucks because you also suck."
Instead of pointing you to this wonderful Paul Graham article:
The comment does not present any supporting evidence (even one query where ddg falls over would help, a deep technical analysis of why google is better, with large scale comparisons of result quality would be persuasive).
It is the equivalent to me replying to you with:
"You don't know why the comment sucks because you also suck."
Instead of pointing you to this wonderful Paul Graham article:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=149052