“The company is not simply a magic mask I can put on and off at will” (comment)
recommended by 1 user | 2016 | patio11 on: Ask HN: Does your company donate to free software it uses? | money & taxes | original thread |
patio11 on Jan 8, 2016 | on: Ask HN: Does your company donate to free software it uses? | view on HN

The company is not simply a magic mask I can put on and off at will; it is constrained by the laws of Japan and the United States, particularly with regards to taxes. Both countries are very lenient with regards to necessary business expenses (必須経費 over here). Neither particularly likes arbitrary money moving out of the company; that smacks of unreported income.

The company has books. All money into the company and out of the company is recorded on those books, in a fashion meeting various legal requirements of both countries. If I say "Donation" next to a line item and the NTA reviews it they'll say "Not allowed; adjust this item to be a distribution to yourself, pay income taxes on it, and don't do this again or we'll be very cross with you." If it says "Software license" the 99.999% case is "Seems reasonable" and the 0.001% case is "Random line-item audit: produce the documentation about this", to which I say "Here's an invoice" and they say "Alrighty then."

Sounds like an excuse to not donate

Again, I do not donate. I just send checks for thousands of dollars to OSS projects.

One user recommended this comment. What they said:
_Microft Jul 30, 2024 | on: Dear AI Companies, instead of scraping OpenStreetMap, how… | context

This old comment by patio11 (Patrick McKenzie, the one behind „Bits about Money“ and the blog at kalzumeus.com) on this topic might be of interest:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10863978

It explains why companies have a lot less problems with invoices than with donations.